%PDF-1.6
%
2 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
Thursday September 6, 2012 11:41:14
ECMP5
VERSACOMP R05.2
2012-09-11T13:26:51-04:00
2012-09-11T13:26:51-04:00
application/pdf
uuid:091c7f9f-c3e6-4730-a7ba-f4129e785493
uuid:c76cfc2c-e6bf-4298-a77a-6e63d351264b
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>
endobj
77 0 obj
<>
endobj
78 0 obj
<>
endobj
79 0 obj
<>
endobj
80 0 obj
<>
endobj
81 0 obj
<>
endobj
86 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
87 0 obj
<>stream
Hn0<ſ.0E
L"uu.邀Ih'62Fmun,s~+cۦ,..+kIָrm~ oܥa3%4MĄI7Z[iڗ*m./]/(U
!(D1|RN"Ĝl9ij_oٖp>;oǺq9cs$%Qӿ)t?Ovy$T$ad#TC/m?Zg|9TAwr({tFVʢQˣ&K-cd)?h3z0v5[6vc7_ |9[ɴ^ux8[NXD} 5mՖ8Rڬ&Mm]Fz 380RJe(| ]
endstream
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
90 0 obj
<>
endobj
88 0 obj
[/ICCBased 91 0 R]
endobj
91 0 obj
<>stream
Hb``$WR~|@T#2S/`M.(*(%8H8c-
fԉd9@6_IjH9(3=DR1%?)U!$5X3/9 ($5j%V*'&*r" (,!!0b;CҢ2(ɘ I8/
endstream
endobj
89 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 1 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 1 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 1 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 1 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 1 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>/ProcSet 1 0 R>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.75 Tw
0 Tc
(zlement," and "breach of fiduciary responsibility" and simply) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.88 Tw
(required the exclusion for offenses "relating to financial mis-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(conduct." ) Tj
12 -26 Td
1.71 Tw
(Furthermore, Morgan's interpretation would not serve the) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.52 Tw
(statute's purposes. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See, e.g.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(United States Nat'l Bank of Ore-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
0 Tw
(gon v. Independent Ins. Agents of Am., Inc.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 508 U.S. 439, 455) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.92 Tw
(\(1993\) \(explaining that "[i]n expounding a statute, we must) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.03 Tw
(not be guided by a single sentence or member of a sentence,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.96 Tw
(but look to the provisions of the whole law, and to its object) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.68 Tw
(and policy" \(internal quotation marks omitted\)\). Congress) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.11 Tw
(enacted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.65 Tw
(Act of 1996 \("HIPAA"\), of which 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.65 Tw
(1320-7\(a\)\(3\)) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.12 Tw
(is a part, "to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in health insur-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.18 Tw
(ance and health care delivery." Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.36 Tw
(1936, 1936 \(1996\). In fact, the legislative history to ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.36 Tw
(1320-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(7\(a\)\(3\) as it was originally enacted indicates that it was spe-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.32 Tw
(cifically intended to protect federal programs from untrust-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
5.55 Tw
(worthy individuals and to "provide a clear and strong) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.51 Tw
(deterrent against the commission of criminal acts."*) Tj
( S. Rep.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.2 Tw
(100-109, at 5 \(1987\), ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1987 U.S.C.C.A.N. 682,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.52 Tw
(686. These purposes indicate that Congress was targeting) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.37 Tw
(fraud generally, not simply fraud relating to financial miscon-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.43 Tw
(duct, and none of the purposes would be served by narrowing) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(the scope of the statute as Morgan urges.) Tj
12 -26.1 Td
3.92 Tw
(Finally, it is worth noting that the Senate Report that) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
2.24 Tw
(accompanied the statute as originally enacted described the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.71 Tw
(provision as applying to "a criminal offense relating to fraud,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
4 Tw
(theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.97 Tw
(financial abuse." S. Rep. No. 100-109, at 6 \(1987\), ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.28 Tw
(in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1987 U.S.C.C.A.N. 682, 687; ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(see ) Tj
(National Elec. Mfrs.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.55 Tw
(Ass'n) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 654 F.3d at 504-05 \("[W]e have described legislative) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.66 Tw
(history as one of the traditional tools of interpretation to be) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.47 Tw
(consulted at ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron's) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( step one."\). Considering that the word) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
.25 Tw
(*As originally enacted, the statute made exclusion from the federal pro-) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(grams only optional as opposed to mandatory. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -466.55 m 300 -466.55 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(6) Tj
104.1801 0 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ORGAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. S) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EBELIUS) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
1 0 obj
[/PDF/Text]
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.12 Tw
0 Tc
(ony relating to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.95 Tw
(responsibility, or other financial misconduct." 42 U.S.C.A.) Tj
0 -13 Td
.41 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.41 Tw
(1320-7\(a\)\(3\). It is undisputed that Morgan was convicted of) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.34 Tw
(a felony relating to fraud and connected to the delivery of) Tj
0 -13 Td
.28 Tw
(health care. He nevertheless maintains that his conviction was) Tj
0 -13 Td
4.26 Tw
(not for "a felony relating to fraud, theft, embezzlement,) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.42 Tw
(breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial miscon-) Tj
0 -13 Td
.71 Tw
(duct" since his offense did not relate to financial misconduct.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(That is incorrect. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
1.25 Tw
(The applicable language makes clear that to warrant man-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
1.57 Tw
(datory exclusion, an offense need only relate to at least one) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.18 Tw
(of five categories: \(1\) fraud, \(2\) theft, \(3\) embezzlement, \(4\)) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.21 Tw
(breach of fiduciary responsibility, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(or) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( \(5\) other financial mis-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.41 Tw
(conduct. The argument that the presence of the fifth category,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.08 Tw
("other financial misconduct," somehow narrows the meaning) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.35 Tw
(of "fraud" from its ordinary usage is unpersuasive. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(Car-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.87 Tw
(bon Fuel Co. v. USX Corp.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 100 F.3d 1124, 1133 \(4th Cir.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.72 Tw
(1996\) \(explaining that unless there is "explicit legislative) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.12 Tw
(intent to the contrary," we must give words in a statute their) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.4 Tw
("plain and ordinary meaning"\). Morgan maintains that if the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.02 Tw
(presence of the word "other" did not have this narrowing) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.89 Tw
(effect, "there would be no reason to have the word `other' in) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
0 Tw
(the statute." Appellant's brief at 11. But that is simply not cor-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.98 Tw
(rect. That the fifth category is ") Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(other) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( financial misconduct") Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.33 Tw
(reflects the fact that the other four categories can, themselves,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.18 Tw
(relate to financial misconduct. In this way, the presence of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.78 Tw
("other" eliminates the possible confusion that could have) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.19 Tw
(resulted from a statute that applied to "embezzlement . . . or) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(financial misconduct." ) Tj
12 -26 Td
3.53 Tw
(In fact, it is Morgan's interpretation that would render) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
2.75 Tw
(much of the language surplusage. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(Gustafson v. Alloyd) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.5 Tw
(Co.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 513 U.S. 561, 574 \(1995\) \(explaining that a court should) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.56 Tw
("avoid a reading which renders some words altogether redun-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.15 Tw
(dant"\). Had Congress intended that an offense must relate to) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.38 Tw
(financial misconduct for the mandatory exclusion to apply,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.57 Tw
(then it could have omitted the terms "fraud," "theft," "embez-) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
450.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(5) Tj
-190.3199 0 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ORGAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. S) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EBELIUS) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<>stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -8.4 Td
1.75 Tw
0 Tc
(Morgan subsequently brought an action in federal district) Tj
-12 -13 Td
2.14 Tw
(court, asserting that the Board erred in failing to recognize) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.37 Tw
(that ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.37 Tw
(1320a-7\(a\)\(3\) applies only to offenses relating to finan-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.18 Tw
(cial misconduct. Concluding that the statute unambiguously is) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.03 Tw
(not limited to offenses relating to financial misconduct, the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(district court dismissed Morgan's action.) Tj
144.504 -26 Td
(II.) Tj
-132.504 -26 Td
1.32 Tw
(Reiterating his argument that ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.32 Tw
(1320a-7\(a\)\(3\) is limited to) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.75 Tw
(offenses relating to financial misconduct, Morgan argues that) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(the district court erred in dismissing his suit. We disagree.) Tj
12 -26 Td
1.92 Tw
("We review questions of statutory construction ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(de novo) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(.") Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
-12 -13.1 Td
3.58 Tw
(Orquera v. Ashcroft) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 357 F.3d 413, 418 \(4th Cir. 2003\).) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.47 Tw
(Because the Secretary is charged with administering ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.47 Tw
(1320a-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.25 Tw
(7\(a\)\(3\), the established rules of deference in ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron U.S.A.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.14 Tw
(Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. 837) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.03 Tw
(\(1984\), guide our analysis. Under ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, if a statute is) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.05 Tw
(unambiguous regarding the question presented, the statute's) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.75 Tw
(plain meaning controls. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(Saintha v. Mukasey) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 516 F.3d) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.17 Tw
(243, 251 \(4th Cir. 2008\). However, "[i]f . . . the statute is) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.44 Tw
(silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue before) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2 Tw
(us, the question for this court becomes whether the [Secre-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.67 Tw
(tary's] interpretation `is based on a permissible construction) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(of the statute.'" ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( \(quoting ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. at 843\).) Tj
12 -26 Td
.97 Tw
(Under ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
('s first step, we "employ[) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.97 Tw
(] traditional tools) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
2.85 Tw
(of statutory construction" in considering whether Congress) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.27 Tw
(addressed "the precise question at issue." ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
0 Tw
(at 842, 843 n.9. In doing so, "we begin with the text and struc-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.41 Tw
(ture of the statute." ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(National Elec. Mfrs. Ass'n v. United) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(States Dep't of Energy) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 654 F.3d 496, 504 \(4th Cir. 2011\). ) Tj
12 -26 Td
.91 Tw
(Congress required the Secretary to exclude from participa-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.48 Tw
(tion in federal health-care programs any person who has been) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.91 Tw
(convicted of an offense "in connection with the delivery of a) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.35 Tw
(health care item or service" if that "offense consist[s] of a fel-) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(4) Tj
104.1801 0 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ORGAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. S) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EBELIUS) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -8.4 Td
2.65 Tw
0 Tc
(On May 30, 2008, the Inspector General \("I.G."\) of the) Tj
-12 -13 Td
2.55 Tw
(Department of Health and Human Services \("HHS"\) wrote) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.52 Tw
(Morgan, notifying him that he would be excluded for five) Tj
0 -13 Td
.83 Tw
(years from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other) Tj
0 -13 Td
.81 Tw
(federal health-care programs pursuant to the applicable terms) Tj
0 -13 Td
.5 Tw
(of 42 U.S.C.A. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.5 Tw
(1320a-7\(a\)\(3\). This statute requires the Sec-) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.31 Tw
(retary to impose such an exclusion on "[a]ny individual or) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.15 Tw
(entity that has been convicted for an offense which occurred) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.63 Tw
(after August 21, 1996, under Federal or State law, in connec-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.81 Tw
(tion with the delivery of a health care item or service" if that) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.01 Tw
(offense consists of a "felony relating to fraud, theft, embezzle-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.1 Tw
(ment, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(misconduct." 42 U.S.C.A. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(1320-7\(a\)\(3\).) Tj
12 -26 Td
.33 Tw
(Morgan appealed the I.G.'s decision in a proceeding before) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.07 Tw
(an Administrative Law Judge \("ALJ"\) in HHS's Departmental) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.74 Tw
(Appeals Board \("DAB"\) Civil Remedies Division. The ALJ) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.4 Tw
(found that the I.G. had a sufficient basis to exclude Morgan) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.27 Tw
(and that the five-year term of the exclusion was not unreason-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(able in light of applicable law. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
3.66 Tw
(Morgan then appealed the ALJ's decision to the DAB) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.41 Tw
(Appellate Division on April 3, 2009. In his proceeding before) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.24 Tw
(the Appeals Board \(the "Board"\), Morgan argued, as is rele-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.66 Tw
(vant here, that to warrant an exclusion under 42 U.S.C.A.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.5 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
3.5 Tw
(1320a-7\(a\)\(3\), a conviction must be for an offense that) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.1 Tw
(relates to financial misconduct. Morgan maintained that his) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.84 Tw
(fraud conviction was not related to "financial misconduct") Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.54 Tw
(since he neither had a corrupt motive nor received any sub-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.11 Tw
(stantial pecuniary benefit in committing the crime to which he) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.67 Tw
(pled guilty. The Board rejected Morgan's argument, finding) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.4 Tw
(that Morgan was excludable under ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.4 Tw
(1320a-7\(a\)\(3\) because) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.35 Tw
(his conviction constituted "fraud" within the plain meaning of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.26 Tw
(the statute regardless of whether it was related to financial) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.04 Tw
(misconduct. The Board additionally concluded, in any event,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.36 Tw
(that his crime was related to financial misconduct insofar as) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.25 Tw
(he "derived some unquantifiable measure of pecuniary value) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(by illegally diverting the controlled substances." J.A. 31. ) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
450.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(3) Tj
-190.3199 0 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ORGAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. S) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EBELIUS) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<>stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.28 Tw
0 Tc
(lee. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
(ON BRIEF:) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( William B. Schultz, Acting General Coun-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.37 Tw
(sel, Catherine L. Hess, Senior Counsel, DEPARTMENT OF) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
3.8 Tw
(HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Washington, D.C.;) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
3.1 Tw
(Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Michael S. Raab,) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.8 Tw
(UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washing-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
3.57 Tw
(ton, D.C.; R. Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney,) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.2 Tw
(Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
123.666 -44.7 Td
(OPINION) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-123.666 -26.5 Td
(PER CURIAM:) Tj
12 -26.4 Td
1.33 Tw
(Breton Lee Morgan appeals a district court order dismiss-) Tj
-12 -13.4 Td
.6 Tw
(ing his action challenging the decision of the Secretary of the) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
3.67 Tw
(United States Department of Health and Human Services) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.54 Tw
(\("the Secretary"\) to exclude him for five years from partici-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.08 Tw
(pating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federally spon-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.11 Tw
(sored health care programs pursuant to the applicable terms of) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.71 Tw
(42 U.S.C.A. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.71 Tw
(1320a-7\(a\)\(3\) \(West 2011\). Finding no error,) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(we affirm.) Tj
146.502 -26.4 Td
(I.) Tj
-134.502 -26.4 Td
3.33 Tw
(Morgan is a physician licensed to practice medicine in) Tj
-12 -13.3 Td
.7 Tw
(West Virginia. In March 2007, he pled guilty to one count of) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.45 Tw
(violating 21 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.45 Tw
(843\(a\)\(3\), which proscribes "knowingly) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.7 Tw
(or intentionally . . . acquir[ing] or obtain[ing] possession of a) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.54 Tw
(controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery,) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.13 Tw
(deception, or subterfuge." 21 U.S.C.A. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
4.13 Tw
(843\(a\)\(3\) \(West) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.77 Tw
(1999\). His plea was based upon several occasions in which) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.45 Tw
(Morgan obtained free hydrocodone samples from pharmaceu-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.55 Tw
(tical representatives for his personal use by leading the repre-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.46 Tw
(sentatives to believe that he would be giving the samples to) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.02 Tw
(his patients for medical purposes. As a result of the plea, Mor-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.66 Tw
(gan was sentenced to 30 days' imprisonment and three) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(months of supervised release.) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -113.85 m 300 -113.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(2) Tj
104.1801 0 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ORGAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. S) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EBELIUS) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
4 0 obj
<>stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 664.5 Tm
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
115.326 -8.4 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
(PUBLISHED) Tj
/F1 19 Tf 84.2 Tz
-114.766 -39.4 Td
1.9 Tw
(UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
66.136 -18 Td
1.2 Tw
(FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-66.696 -18 Td
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
0 0 Td
183.8 0 Td
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
-2.18 -17.6 Td
2 Tw
() Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-181.62 -2.8 Td
1.2 Tw
(B) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(RETON) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( L) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EE) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ORGAN) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, M.D.,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
80.988 -18 Td
(Plaintiff-Appellant,) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.512 -18 Td
(v.) Tj
135.57 -13.2 Td
(No. 10-2270) Tj
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
-36.45 -1.3 Td
2 Tw
() Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-181.62 -3.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(K) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ATHLEEN) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( S) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EBELIUS) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, Secretary of) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Department of Health and Human) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Services,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
75.024 -18 Td
(Defendant-Appellee.) Tj
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
106.596 -8.8 Td
1.6 Ts
2 Tw
() Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-142.878 -25.8 Td
1.2 Tw
(Appeal from the United States District Court) Tj
-31.53 -13 Td
(for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington.) Tj
53.226 -13 Td
(Robert C. Chambers, District Judge.) Tj
50.238 -13 Td
(\(3:09-cv-01059\)) Tj
-17.136 -25.8 Td
(Argued: May 17, 2012) Tj
-1.998 -26 Td
(Decided: June 14, 2012) Tj
-91.05 -25.8 Td
(Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN,) Tj
112.908 -13 Td
(Circuit Judges.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-113.4 -50.6 Td
(Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
120.996 -43.7 Td
(COUNSEL) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
-120.996 -25.9 Td
1.28 Tw
(ARGUED:) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( James Michael Casey, Point Pleasant, West Vir-) Tj
0 -13 Td
6.05 Tw
(ginia, for Appellant. Daniel Tenny, UNITED STATES) Tj
0 -13 Td
.38 Tw
(DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appel-) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 664.5 cm
0 G
.9 w 0 -83.35 m 183.8 -83.35 l s
1.2 w 186.6 -139.1 m 186.6 -91.2 l s
1.2 w 186.6 -204 m 186.6 -156.1 l s
.9 w 0 -210.95 m 183.3 -210.95 l s
.5 w 0 -391.25 m 300 -391.25 l s
.5 w 0 -441.85 m 300 -441.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
92 0 obj
<>stream
HV[sH~WG;}TDSO>lF,LͿC#>\Gn}{xO-CaPSd@Gץ
:#9=0}p
:\*P]uR]&28U~:X0~)+)l8еϗO0|}NoQZW4_;)74t1^N336">6a$Ms01>P2!JͨJEESZs1kXaD.%DBa*YLݢܤ:1kоkJGɎvL> X.PeRD}$S^![{
bkS\UKk-ȳ*=eo*Ope/Rboڏ}$W'qZ{W
'fJ[2$(z-7m)_zZdvdW|x}a*#L/@Wk/I=ubZTb9{]Ķ`&`
Gr BV|C}"W vNRY L~˳a> mAqr\u\Bx~1+
endstream
endobj
93 0 obj
<>
endobj
94 0 obj
<>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>
endobj
82 0 obj
<